Russian
Konstantin Chernushenko
Senior Producer
Russian
January, 2026
We continue our discussion of the New Testament, and this month we are focused on the Letter to the Ephesians.
The most crucial problem in the study of Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians is whether Paul wrote it. It claims unambiguously to come from Paul's hand, both in the very first word of the letter and in numerous other personal references. Doubts among scholars as to the literal truth of these claims have arisen due to several factors.
Some of these include the author's obviously limited acquaintance with his readers, something highly puzzling if Paul is writing to his friends in Ephesus, where he spent nearly three years. Likewise, the literary relationship between this letter and that to the Colossians shows that if they were not written at the same time by the same person, then one was modeled on the other. Yet, the vocabulary and style of Ephesians are considerably different from that in Colossians, suggesting that the two documents were not authored by one person.
Furthermore, the teaching of Ephesians is thought to reflect situations in the early church which postdate the death of Paul by several decades in some cases (e.g., the references to "apostles and prophets" in 2:20; 3:5). These factors add up to the possibility that Paul himself is not the author of Ephesians. Nevertheless, taken one by one, the separate pieces of evidence can be adequately explained on the assumption of Pauline authorship. It is their cumulative effect which carries the greatest weight against authenticity. Yet even the accumulation of evidence is not a watertight case, but only a case for probability, and history is replete with the improbable. Without being either dogmatic or credulous, we may with good conscience approach Ephesians as a letter from the apostle Paul.
In our study of the Old Testament, we focus on the book of Amos (the prophet).
This exemplary composition, dealing with the ethical and moral implications of the Israelite covenantal religion, has been attributed consistently through the ages to Amos of Tekoa. His name, which may mean "burden-bearer" or "burdensome," is distinctive in that it does not occur anywhere else in the Old Testament. The name is mentioned once in the New Testament (Luke 3:25), but an entirely different person is involved. Jewish tradition suggested that the name was a shortened form of Amaziah (see Amos 7:10, where the two are contrasted), or Amasiah, which itself occurs only once in the Old Testament (2 Chron. 17:16).
The prophet Amos was born in Tekoa, a village located on a hill some twenty-eight hundred feet above sea level, overlooking the wilderness of Judah. It was somewhat isolated from Jerusalem, the capital of the southern kingdom, situated six miles south of Bethlehem. The ancient name has survived in the modern Arabic Tequ, an area that is well suited to the rearing of sheep and goats. From this elevation the prophet could contemplate the significance of God's message for the nation as he looked beyond the nearby caravan trails to the desolate Judean wilderness. The wasteland would obviously serve as a reminder of his nation's future if covenantal law was continuously disobeyed.
Although Amos disclaimed any connection with prophetic guilds and was not a priest (as were Jeremiah and Ezekiel) or an aristocrat (as was Isaiah), he should not thereby be dismissed as an ignorant peasant just because he made a living from shepherding animals and from seasonal work in the fig groves. His prophecies show him to have been a thoughtful, spiritually minded person who was alarmed at the fate in store for the nation if its light did not reflect the justice and righteousness that were basic to covenantal law. Like many other Hebrews, Amos exhibited poetic gifts, and his oracles are models of articulate speech, beautifully crafted literary idioms, and a passionate concern for the nation to turn away from idolatry and worship the Lord of Sinai as Israel's one and only true God.
We have several projects under development that might be interesting to you. Come and download numerous Christian books, listen to our programs, see several video lessons based on Russian Christian art, and take a look at pictures of beautiful Alaska. Do you have critical remarks or brilliant ideas about improving our broadcasting? Send us your suggestions and we will do our best to make the programs better.
We will endeavor, our dear listeners, in search of the connection
between the different parts of these verses.
First, the apostle lays down a Christian’s duty- “Let every one of us please his neighbor for
his good to edification.” After that he brings forward as the sanction of that duty, the spirit
of the Life of Christ– “For even Christ pleased not Himself.” Next, he adds an illustration of
that principle by a quotation from Psalm 69: – “It is written, the reproaches of them that
reproached thee fell on Me.” Lastly, he explains and defends that application of the psalm, as if he had said, I am perfectly justified in applying that passage to Christ, for whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning.'”
So that in this quotation, and the defense of it as contained in these verses, we have the principle of Apostolic interpretation; we have the principle upon which the apostles used the Old Testament Scriptures and we are enabled to understand their view of inspiration, This scriptures, is one of the most important considerations upon which we can be at this moment engaged. It is the deepest question of our day: the one which lies beneath all others, and in comparison, of which the questions just now agitating the popular mind– whether of Papal jurisdiction or varieties of Church doctrine in our own communion–are but superficial: it is this grand question of Inspiration which is given to this age to solve.
Our programs will break itself up into questions such as these-What the Bible is, and what the Bible is not? What is meant by inspiration? Whether inspiration is the same thing as infallibility? When God inspired the minds, did He dictate the words? Does the inspiration of men mean the infallibility of their words? Is inspiration the same as dictation? Whether, granting that we have the Word of God, we have also the words of God? Are the operations of the Holy Spirit inspiring men, compatible with partial error, as His operations in sanctifying them are compatible with partial evil? How are we to interpret and apply the Scriptures?
As always, we have other projects under development that might be interesting to you. Come and download numerous Christian books, listen to our programs, see several video lessons based on Russian Christian art, look at pictures of beautiful Alaska, the home of our first radio station, KNLS.
Thanks for reading and for listening.